CDTA 1Winter 65 & Over W/E — 2026
View on TennisLink · Match Planner · Roster
| # | Team | W | L | IW | IL | SW | SL | GW | GL | G% | #P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tam (Spangler) | 6 | 1 | 16 | 5 | 34 | 14 | 221 | 167 | 57.0% | 13 |
| 2 | Wheat (Mills) | 6 | 0 | 14 | 4 | 29 | 11 | 200 | 128 | 61.0% | 16 |
| 3 | DC (Rubin) | 2 | 4 | 10 | 8 | 22 | 17 | 175 | 144 | 54.9% | 14 |
| 4 | MTB (Lyden) | 2 | 3 | 4 | 11 | 10 | 24 | 100 | 159 | 38.6% | 12 |
| 5 | Tam (Robbie) | 0 | 8 | 3 | 21 | 10 | 43 | 146 | 268 | 35.3% | 17 |
How each team's probability of finishing 1st evolves as match results come in.
Based on 10000 simulations (16 played, 4 remaining, strategy: availability) · Updated Apr 27, 2026
| # | Team | Avg W | Avg L | Win% | 1st% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CDTA W 65&OM7.0 4.Wheat Mills Sun 12 $20 | 7.3 | 0.7 | 91% | 43% |
| 2 | CDTA W 65&OM7.0 1.Tam Spangler Sat 3 $22 | 6.6 | 1.4 | 82% | 57% |
| 3 | CDTA W 65&OM7.0 3.DC Rubin Sun 11:30 $20 | 3.6 | 4.4 | 45% | 0% |
| 4 | CDTA W 65&OM7.0 2.MTB Lyden Sat 10 $27 | 2.5 | 5.5 | 31% | 0% |
| 5 | CDTA W 65&OM7.0 5.Tam Robbie Sat 1 $22 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 0% | 0% |
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDTA W 65&OM7.0 4.Wheat Mills Sun 12 $20 | 43% | 57% | — | — | — |
| CDTA W 65&OM7.0 1.Tam Spangler Sat 3 $22 | 57% | 43% | — | — | — |
| CDTA W 65&OM7.0 3.DC Rubin Sun 11:30 $20 | — | — | 92% | 8% | — |
| CDTA W 65&OM7.0 2.MTB Lyden Sat 10 $27 | — | — | 8% | 92% | — |
| CDTA W 65&OM7.0 5.Tam Robbie Sat 1 $22 | — | — | — | — | 100% |
Impact of each remaining match on probability of finishing 1st.
| Opponent | Date | 1st% if Win | 1st% if Loss | Swing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDTA W 65&OM7.0 1.Tam Spangler Sat 3 $22 | 5/2/2026 | 100% | 0% | +100% |
| CDTA W 65&OM7.0 2.MTB Lyden Sat 10 $27 | 4/19/2026 | 43% | 44% | -1% |
| Opponent | Date | 1st% if Win | 1st% if Loss | Swing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDTA W 65&OM7.0 4.Wheat Mills Sun 12 $20 | 5/2/2026 | 100% | 0% | +100% |