CDTA ESL 40 & Over — 2026
View on TennisLink · Match Planner · Roster
| # | Team | W | L | IW | IL | SW | SL | GW | GL | G% | #P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tam (Kanev) | 9 | 1 | 28 | 12 | 59 | 33 | 409 | 333 | 55.1% | 15 |
| 2 | Tam (Bhat) | 8 | 2 | 29 | 11 | 64 | 30 | 420 | 272 | 60.7% | 26 |
| 3 | RT (Ciuca) | 5 | 5 | 22 | 18 | 53 | 47 | 400 | 356 | 52.9% | 18 |
| 4 | Naper (Esancy) | 5 | 5 | 21 | 19 | 51 | 41 | 395 | 316 | 55.6% | 18 |
| 5 | FV (Rustagi) | 3 | 7 | 17 | 23 | 42 | 52 | 349 | 331 | 51.3% | 24 |
| 6 | MTB (Spurgeon) | 0 | 10 | 3 | 37 | 8 | 74 | 92 | 457 | 16.8% | 17 |
How each team's probability of finishing 1st evolves as match results come in.
Based on 10000 simulations (30 played, 0 remaining, strategy: availability) · Updated Mar 18, 2026
| # | Team | Avg W | Avg L | Win% | 1st% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CDTA E 40&OM3.5 1Tam Kanev Sun 5 $22 | 9.0 | 1.0 | 90% | 100% |
| 2 | CDTA E 40&OM3.5 2Tam Bhat Sat 3 $22 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 80% | 0% |
| 3 | CDTA E 40&OM3.5 3RT Ciuca Sun 2 $27 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 50% | 0% |
| 4 | CDTA E 40&OM3.5 6Naper Esancy Sun 4:30 $24 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 50% | 0% |
| 5 | CDTA E 40&OM3.5 4FV Rustagi Sun 4 $25 | 3.0 | 7.0 | 30% | 0% |
| 6 | CDTA E 40&OM3.5 5MTB Spurgeon Sun 2 $27 | 0.0 | 10.0 | 0% | 0% |
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDTA E 40&OM3.5 1Tam Kanev Sun 5 $22 | 100% | — | — | — | — | — |
| CDTA E 40&OM3.5 2Tam Bhat Sat 3 $22 | — | 100% | — | — | — | — |
| CDTA E 40&OM3.5 3RT Ciuca Sun 2 $27 | — | — | 100% | — | — | — |
| CDTA E 40&OM3.5 6Naper Esancy Sun 4:30 $24 | — | — | — | 100% | — | — |
| CDTA E 40&OM3.5 4FV Rustagi Sun 4 $25 | — | — | — | — | 100% | — |
| CDTA E 40&OM3.5 5MTB Spurgeon Sun 2 $27 | — | — | — | — | — | 100% |