CDTA ESL 40 & Over — 2026
View on TennisLink · Match Planner · Roster
| # | Team | W | L | IW | IL | SW | SL | GW | GL | G% | #P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gnbk (Burns) | 7 | 2 | 23 | 13 | 48 | 28 | 360 | 262 | 57.9% | 19 |
| 2 | Naper (Blaauw) | 6 | 3 | 24 | 12 | 51 | 30 | 360 | 282 | 56.1% | 19 |
| 3 | Tam (Jurczyk) | 4 | 5 | 18 | 18 | 38 | 42 | 287 | 313 | 47.8% | 18 |
| 4 | Gnbk (Ueda) | 1 | 8 | 7 | 29 | 23 | 60 | 236 | 386 | 37.9% | 25 |
How each team's probability of finishing 1st evolves as match results come in.
Based on 10000 simulations (18 played, 0 remaining, strategy: availability) · Updated Feb 24, 2026
| # | Team | Avg W | Avg L | Win% | 1st% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CDTA E 40&OW4.5 4Gnbk Burns Sat 3 $30 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 78% | 100% |
| 2 | CDTA E 40&OW4.5 2Naper Blaauw Sat 4 $24 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 67% | 0% |
| 3 | CDTA E 40&OW4.5 3Tam Jurczyk Sat 1 $22 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 44% | 0% |
| 4 | CDTA E 40&OW4.5 1Gnbk Ueda Sun 11 $30 | 1.0 | 8.0 | 11% | 0% |
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDTA E 40&OW4.5 4Gnbk Burns Sat 3 $30 | 100% | — | — | — |
| CDTA E 40&OW4.5 2Naper Blaauw Sat 4 $24 | — | 100% | — | — |
| CDTA E 40&OW4.5 3Tam Jurczyk Sat 1 $22 | — | — | 100% | — |
| CDTA E 40&OW4.5 1Gnbk Ueda Sun 11 $30 | — | — | — | 100% |