CDTA Winter 40 & Over W/E — 2025
View on TennisLink · Match Planner · Roster
| # | Team | W | L | IW | IL | SW | SL | GW | GL | G% | #P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Naperville (Blaauw) | 7 | 2 | 22 | 14 | 50 | 33 | 341 | 283 | 54.6% | 20 |
| 2 | Tam (Jurczyk) | 6 | 3 | 24 | 12 | 51 | 35 | 332 | 292 | 53.2% | 23 |
| 3 | Glenbrook (Burns) | 5 | 4 | 18 | 18 | 44 | 41 | 341 | 293 | 53.8% | 22 |
| 4 | Glenbrook (Ueda) | 0 | 9 | 8 | 28 | 21 | 57 | 235 | 381 | 38.1% | 27 |
How each team's probability of finishing 1st evolves as match results come in.
Based on 10000 simulations (18 played, 0 remaining, strategy: availability) · Updated Feb 24, 2026
| # | Team | Avg W | Avg L | Win% | 1st% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CDTA W 40&OW4.5 4.Naperville Blaauw Sat 4 $24 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 78% | 100% |
| 2 | CDTA W 40&OW4.5 1.Tam Jurczyk Sat 4 $22 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 67% | 0% |
| 3 | CDTA W 40&OW4.5 3.Glenbrook Burns Sat 3 $25 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 56% | 0% |
| 4 | CDTA W 40&OW4.5 2.Glenbrook Ueda Sun 11 $25 | 0.0 | 9.0 | 0% | 0% |
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDTA W 40&OW4.5 4.Naperville Blaauw Sat 4 $24 | 100% | — | — | — |
| CDTA W 40&OW4.5 1.Tam Jurczyk Sat 4 $22 | — | 100% | — | — |
| CDTA W 40&OW4.5 3.Glenbrook Burns Sat 3 $25 | — | — | 100% | — |
| CDTA W 40&OW4.5 2.Glenbrook Ueda Sun 11 $25 | — | — | — | 100% |